Phase 1
Augment
Deploy SenseOn alongside the existing SIEM. A lightweight Universal Sensor starts collecting endpoint, network, identity, cloud, and email telemetry without breaking current workflows.
THE SIEM ALTERNATIVE
Plan your SIEM exit. Prove it first. Cut over later.
SenseOn gives security teams a governed way to escape SIEM cost chaos without breaking the stack that keeps them running today. Deploy alongside your current SIEM, compare real detection and response evidence, then consolidate only where the proof is clear.
92.5%
Incidents resolved by AI under human governance
<20 min
Mean time to detect, investigate, and respond in live deployments
£0
Per-GB data charges. Pay for outcomes, not ingest
All data
Keep telemetry available instead of creating blind spots to protect SIEM budgets
WHY SIEM PROJECTS STALL
The hardest part is not buying the alternative. It is proving the switch.
Security leaders know when SIEM costs and alert queues are out of control. The block is risk: rules, audits, data pipelines, and board confidence are all tied to the incumbent platform.
Ingest economics create blind spots
Per-GB pricing turns every new data source into a budget trade-off. Teams filter, sample, or exclude telemetry and hope the missing signal is not the one that matters.
Analysts inherit the integration burden
Rules, parsers, and case context live across consoles. Analysts spend too much time reconciling alerts instead of deciding what to do next.
The board wants proof before change
Finance and audit teams need evidence that detection, response, and compliance reporting improve before they sign off on a migration plan.
A SIEM alternative built for proof before migration
Traditional SIEM makes visibility a cost-control problem. SenseOn changes the sequence: augment the live stack, prove better detection and response, then consolidate with finance and audit evidence.
| Factor | SenseOn | Traditional SIEM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flex Intelligence Credits fund governed outcomes. No per-GB data tax. | Per-GB charges rise as your environment grows. |
| Detection model | Cross-domain correlation joins endpoint, identity, network, cloud, and email before triage. | Static rules need tuning and only see forwarded logs. |
| Data coverage | Collect telemetry without creating budget-driven blind spots. | Teams filter, sample, or exclude sources to control ingest. |
| Deployment | Run beside the SIEM for a 14-28 day proof window before consolidation. | Migration programmes force long dual-running periods and risky cutovers. |
| Analyst effort | AI-assisted investigation reduces the triage queue under human governance. | Analysts triage raw alerts, tune rules, and pivot between consoles. |
| Compliance evidence | Evidence Packs and reporting support NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, and Cyber Essentials Plus. | Compliance reporting usually needs custom dashboards and manual evidence collection. |
| Consolidation path | Augment, prove gaps, redirect low-value data, then retire overlap on your timeline. | Rip-and-replace plans stall around rules, audits, and workflows. |
THE PROOF PATH
Move from SIEM dependency to evidence-backed consolidation
Buyers trust a migration only when they can inspect the evidence. SenseOn turns that into a practical proof path: live telemetry, measurable comparisons, and a clear decision trail before consolidation.
Phase 2
Prove
Run both systems in parallel for a 14-28 day proof window. Your team sees what SenseOn catches, what the SIEM misses, and where response time improves.
Phase 3
Redirect
Move high-volume, low-value sources into the SenseOn Data Lakehouse. Keep visibility available while reducing the per-GB pressure on the incumbent SIEM.
Phase 4
Consolidate
Retire overlapping SIEM, EDR, NDR, SOAR, and UEBA licences only when the evidence supports it. No forced cutover, no blind leap.
PROOF
Proof for security, finance, and audit teams
A SIEM alternative has to win trust before it wins budget. SenseOn combines customer outcomes, independent testing, and audit-ready controls.
BSI ISO 27001
Certified security management programme
SE Labs AAA
Independently tested detection quality
AV-Comparatives
Independent endpoint protection testing
Gartner Peer Insights
Rated 4.9/5 by reviewers
World Economic Forum
Technology Pioneer
CUSTOMER STORIES
Trusted by teams moving beyond legacy SIEM
Security teams use SenseOn to cut noise, keep existing tools stable, and give the board evidence it can read.
“What convinced me was the augment-first approach. We kept our existing tools running while SenseOn proved its value alongside them. No rip-and-replace, no risk.”
NEXT STEP
Map the SIEM exit path your board can approve
Bring your current SIEM, alert volume, data sources, and renewal pressure. We will show the augment-first route, the proof you should expect in a PoV, and where consolidation could happen without a blind cutover.