Skip to main content
SenseOn
SEE IT WORK

How we write and check what we publish

How SenseOn writes, checks and publishes its research, guides and product pages, including where AI is used and who reviews the work.

Who writes SenseOn content

Articles bylined SenseOn Research Team, SenseOn Threat Research or SenseOn Team are written by SenseOn's security research, detection engineering and product staff. Threat research draws on what the SenseOn platform observes across customer estates and on public primary sources. Product pages are written by the product and marketing teams and checked by the engineers who build the feature described.

How AI is used

SenseOn uses AI assistants to draft, restructure and fact-check content. Every piece is reviewed by a named person before it is published, and that person is responsible for its accuracy. AI is not used to generate pages at scale, to rewrite other people's work, or to publish anything without review.

What every page must pass before it goes live

Every article and platform page is checked against Google's published guidance on helpful, people-first content before publication. The check is written down and run in code, and the judgement questions are answered in the change request that publishes the page. In short, a page must:

  1. Cite primary sources for its claims. Research and guide posts link to at least three external sources such as MITRE ATT&CK, NCSC, NIST, CISA, the ICO, vendor documentation or published studies.
  2. Add something a reader cannot get from the first page of search results: original data, a comparison table, a procedure that can be followed, or a quoted primary document.
  3. Carry a byline, a publication date and a modification date that changes only when the content changes.
  4. Use the words readers search with in the title and headings, without repeating them for effect.
  5. Link to related SenseOn pages so a reader can go deeper without searching again.
  6. Contain no draft markers, placeholders or unverified numbers.

Product claims

Where a page describes SenseOn capability that is still being built, it says so in the tense used: "will" or "is designed to" rather than "does". Independent test results are linked to the testing body's own publication.

Corrections

If you find an error, tell us through the contact form with the page address and the correction. Corrections are made on the page and the modification date is updated.